Illegal Immigration and Government Involvement - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 895 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/02/20 Category Sociology Essay Level High school Tags: Illegal Immigration Essay Did you like this example? DREAMers and MS-13 are two completely different groups of people, yet they are grouped together through one huge controversy: illegal immigration. According to the Cambridge Dictionary, â€Å"[an] illegal immigrant [is] someone who lives or works in another country when they do not have the legal right to do this.† There are countless questions and issues that arise from discussing illegal immigration, but one of the biggest issues right now in this country is whether illegal immigrants should receive government benefits or not. Due to the increasing debt the United States is in and the level of poverty in the United States, illegal immigrants should not receive government benefits. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Illegal Immigration and Government Involvement" essay for you Create order With the United States debt reaching tens of trillions of dollars, the government should look at saving itself rather than people who are not supposed to be here. According to the â€Å"U.S. Debt Clock†, the debt the United States is currently in is 21.49 trillion dollars. Also, according to the â€Å"U.S. Debt Clock†, the United States has the highest debt in the world, beating China by roughly 19 trillion dollars. Many my argue that illegal immigrants pay their fair share of taxes, but this is not the case. According to Matt O’Brien and Spencer Raley, researchers for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, gross national cost of illegal immigrants is 134,863,455,364, while the taxes paid by illegal immigrants is 18,968,857,700, equaling out to a national deficit of 116 billion dollars. The money is coming out of taxpayers’ pockets, both native born and legal immigrants. This may seem miniscule compared to the national debt, but according to â€Å"Federal Spending: Where Does the Money Go†, illegal immigration would be the seventh most costly federal spending, which is more than what the United State s spends on education each year. This means that the federal and state governments together spend more money on criminals than they do on educating the future leaders of this country. Claire Felter and Danielle Renwick write, â€Å"The undocumented population is about eleven million and has leveled off since the 2008 economic crisis.† With these numbers, one illegal immigrant costs the United States 10,545 dollars each year. According to O’Brien and Raley, â€Å"the federal government spends 1.6 billion dollars on education of illegal immigrants, 17.1 billion dollars on medical cost of illegal immigrants, 13.1 billion dollars on justice expenditures of illegal immigrants, and 5.8 billion dollars on welfare programs for illegal immigrants.† The United States does not have room in the budget for this. No matter someone’s opinion on illegal immigration and the ethics behind the whole issue, it is evident that illegal immigration is costing the United States money it just does not have. Poverty of United States citizens is a gigantic problem that will only get worse if the government does not turn to helping its own people. According to Paul Nyhan, senior writer for the Marguerite Casey Foundation, â€Å"[t]he number of people living in poverty fell again last year, reaching the lowest level since the Great Recession began in 2007, with 12.7 percent of Americans living below the federal poverty line, the U.S. Census Bureau reported on Sept. 12.† Although it is wonderful news that poverty made a decline, still 12.7 percent of people are living below the poverty line. These are men, women, and children who are citizens of the United States, yet they still suffer each day. In fact, about a third of those living in poverty are children (Nyhan). Poverty is a huge problem in the United States, and illegal immigrants are not helping. According to Gwynn Guilford, Quartz reporter, â€Å"[b]y 2014, unauthorized immigrants, on average, earned only 3.4% less than their legal peers.† Illegal immigrants cost companies thirty-four cents less per ten dollars, which means that compared to their peers making minimum wage, illegal immigrants cost companies ten dollars less each work week. With hundreds of illegal immigrants working for years in these companies, it is cheaper for companies to hire them. This is taking jobs away from American families that need them. Many people may believe that illegal immigrants support the economy, such as Steven Zahniser, Thomas Hertz, Peter B. Dixon, and Maureen T. Rimmer, who write that fifty percent of illegal immigrants work in agriculture and if there was a loss if illegal immigrants, fruit and vegetable production would drop from two to five percent. According to the â€Å"U.S. debt clock†, there are eleven million people unemployed right now. If the eleven million illegal immigrants did not work in America, then those jobs would be open to those unemployed. Illegal immigration does not help the economy; it keeps hard wo rking Americans from having a job. Government benefits should be strictly for Americans because the escalating debt is taking away any extra money that is in the budget and poverty in America is still an epidemic. Whether one supports illegal immigration or not, it is obvious that there is no room for government spending on illegal immigrants. If one strictly looks at the laws of the United States and monetary availability of the United States, its obvious that America does not have the ability to care for those that are not supposed to be here. The debt keeps piling up and poverty is destroying the country. To help others, one must help him or herself first. This is no different in a country. America must fix itself first if this country wants to ever truly help others.

A Rose for Emily - Biography William Faulkner - 3892 Words

BIOGRAPHY William Faulkner (September 25, 1897 – July 6, 1962) was a Nobel Prize-winning American author. One of the most influential writers of the 20th century, his reputation is based on his novels, novellas and short stories. However, he was also a published poet and an occasional screenwriter. Most of Faulkners works are set in his native state of Mississippi, and he is considered one of the most important Southern writers, along with Mark Twain, Robert Penn Warren, Flannery OConnor, Truman Capote, Eudora Welty, and Tennessee Williams. While his work was published regularly starting in the mid 1920s, Faulkner was relatively unknown before receiving the 1949 Nobel Prize in Literature. He is now deemed among the greatest†¦show more content†¦They discover a dusty room strangely decorated as a bridal room. The room contains a mans tie, suit and shoes, and a silver toilet set which Miss Emily had purchased for Homer years before his disappearance. Homers remains lay on the bed, dressed in a nightshirt. Next to him is an impression of a head on a pillow where the townspeople find a single â€Å"long strand of iron-gray hair.† It is thus implied that not only had Emily killed Homer with the arsenic, but also has had an intimate (possibly sexual) relationship with his corpse up to her own death. adolescence. Besides, social prejudice or judgments has a powerful strength for it can rise people up and get people down at the same time. CHARACTERS *Homer Barron Homer Barron is the Yankee construction foreman who becomes Emily Grierson’s first real beau. His relationship with Emily is considered scandalous because he is a Northerner and because it doesn’t appear as if they will ever be married. In fact, it is known that he drinks with younger men in the Elks’ Club and he has remarked that he is not a marrying man. The lovers ignore the gossip of the town until Emily’s two female cousins from Alabama arrive. Homer leaves town for several days until the cousins go back to Alabama. Meanwhile, Emily purchases arsenic, a monogrammed toilet set with the initials H.B., and men’s clothing. Homer returns to Jefferson three days afterShow MoreRelatedSetting Analysis of the Story a Rose for Emily1007 Words   |  5 Pagesanalysis of the setting of â€Å"A Rose for Emily† by William Faulkner’s William Faulkner is one of the greatest writers of the twentieth century. Although he was born in New Albany, Mississippi in 1897 he moved to Oxford, Mississippi before his fifth birthday. Faulkner belonged to a once-wealthy family of former plantation owners (eNotes.com, Inc., 2012). He spent his boyhood hunting and fishing in and around Lafayette County (eNotes.com, Inc., 2012). William Faulkner based most of his stories andRead MoreCritique Of A Rose For Emily By William Faulkner978 Words   |  4 PagesCritique of â€Å"A Rose for Emily† by William Faulkner When thinking about American writers from the South, what is one of the first names that come to mind? Of course, that name would be William Faulkner. â€Å"William Faulkner, a major American twentieth-century author, wrote historical novels portraying the decline and decay of the upper crust of Southern society (William Faulkner Biography)†. He was born on September 25, 1897, in New Albany, Mississippi. His lineage was that of wealth and stature; howeverRead MoreFeminism In A Rose For Emily1379 Words   |  6 Pageswere thought of as being inferior to men, especially when it comes to literature. However, William Faulkner was of the belief that women were the foundation of the family, but also depicted women being as a lesser, more gullible, and small-minded person to the fellow man. Faulkner’s stories focus on the main themes and timeless moral issues of the time such as sexism, social class, and racism. ‘A Rose for Emily’ focuses on sexism and some class issues, showing comparisons between men and women. WomenRead MoreA Rose for Emily - title2099 Words   |  9 PagesBibliography Literary Analysis of â€Å"A Rose for Emily† Brett Wenzel Writing for College Mrs. Paucek April 5, 2013 Annotated Bibliography Summary Analysis Planning Thomas Dilworth Melczarek, Nick. Narrative Motivation In Faulkners A ROSE FOR EMILY. Explicator 67.4 (2009): 237-243. Literary Reference Center. Web. 15 Mar. This summary of this analysis is good because they did analysis of â€Å"A Rose for Emily†. They did use much info for the Faulkner and was very useful. He had muchRead MoreThe Theory of Alienation Proven Wrong : People are more Alienated in their Community. 1795 Words   |  8 Pagesenvironment, that is why the argument in this paper is considered irrelevant. The kinds of alienation that will be discussed is immigration and social alienation as they are the involved in the literary text below: â€Å"A Pair of Tickets†, and â€Å" A Rose for Emily.† The community is perceived as a haven. People believe that one can rarely feel isolated in their community but recent studies have shown that it is very possible for one to be alienated even in their own community. Therefore, it is right toRead MoreThe Characteristics of Hemingways Works2503 Words   |  11 Pagesof war. Hemingway’s writing style is arguably the most distinctive characteristic of his works. The minimalist style is the core of Hemingway’s writing style. His writing style contrasts with William Faulkner’s meticulous writing style. Margaret Anne OConnor and John Alberti described, â€Å"If Faulkner confuses readers because he offers so many details for readers to sift through in order to understand whats going on, Hemingway confuses by offering so few† (par. 8). Hemingway developed his simpleRead MoreThe Roaring Twenties3168 Words   |  13 Pagesmodernist fiction era. Throughout the 1920s decade, Americans were a part of the fevered frenzy that accompanied the dream of total freedom; a dream that encompassed the ideas of rebellion and equality. Lucy Moore, author of Anything Goes; a Biography of the Roaring Twenties, describes how Walter Fabian utilized terms and phrases like â€Å"restless, seductive, greedy, discontented, craving sensation, unrestrained, a little morbid, more than a little selfish, intelligent, uneducated† to describe ZeldaRead MoreEudora Welty a Worn Path12166 Words   |  49 Pagesstorage retrieval systems without the written permission of the publisher. For complete copyright information on these eNotes please visit: http://www.enotes.com/worn−path/copyright Table of Contents 1. A Worn Path: Introduction 2. Eudora Welty Biography 3. Summary 4. Characters 5. Themes 6. Style 7. Historical Context 8. Critical Overview 9. Essays and Criticism 10. Compare and Contrast 11. Topics for Further Study 12. Media Adaptations 13. What Do I Read Next? 14. Bibliography and Further ReadingRead MoreEudora Welty a Worn Path12173 Words   |  49 Pagesstorage retrieval systems without the written permission of the publisher. For complete copyright information on these eNotes please visit: http://www.enotes.com/worn−path/copyright Table of Contents 1. A Worn Path: Introduction 2. Eudora Welty Biography 3. Summary 4. Characters 5. Themes 6. Style 7. Historical Context 8. Critical Overview 9. Essays and Criticism 10. Compare and Contrast 11. Topics for Further Study 12. Media Adaptations 13. What Do I Read Next? 14. Bibliography and Further ReadingRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pagesspeakers. In 1840, in his introduction to The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, William Whewell wrote: We very much need a name to describe a cultivator of science in general. I propose to call him a scientist. Whewells stipulative definition caught on. It has now become a correct lexical definition. Persuasive definitions are another category of definitions. Take the definition of atheist proposed by William, an acquaintance of mine: By atheist I mean a non-Christian pervert who will rot

Treatment of Femininity in Pygmalion and Medea free essay sample

In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting the way in which two different authors portray femininity in their respective dramatic texts. The two works I am using are Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw and Medea by Euripides. I will be looking at how the way men and women are portrayed can affect the way we interpret the texts, and showing that femininity isn’t necessarily a trait restricted just to women. I believe that femininity reflects expected female behaviour. There are certain traits which are believed to be typically male or female. Male traits tend to be more physical such as the fact that they are dominant, stronger whereas female traits are much softer, more emotional. In ancient Athenian society such things as ‘bravery in battle’ and ‘general competitive excellence in a public arena’(1) were considered masculine whereas women were relegated to ‘looking after the household and bringing up their children’(2). However, femininity has changed as times have changed. It reflects the acceptable social behaviour of the period. As women were seen as more equal to men, the restrictions on them lessened. So by the time Pygmalion was written in 1912 it was acceptable for women to support themselves: something that was unheard of in Medea’s time. When Pygmalion was written the woman’s movement was well underway and women were starting to demand rights and become more independent. It was no longer assumed that women would marry just to be looked after. Men no longer automatically took the controlling role. Eliza is a prime example of this as although she is not very well off she is self sufficient as a flower-girl. Medea on the other hand is set at a time when women were completely submissive to their husbands. Once married all of their property automatically became their husbands. Medea has no legal political rights; not only because she is a women but also because she is an outsider. Medea’s reference to women being ‘weak and timid in most matters’ (3) (line 260) reflects the general view of women by society. The way the two pieces are written and acted are also completely different. Medea would have been played by an all male cast to a predominantly, if not exclusively male audience, whereas Pygmalion was acted by both men and women. In Medea actors would have worn female masks, which lack emotion and cover up facial expressions. Right from the beginning the play takes on an unrealistic air as women and men wouldn’t have been able to debate in public as Medea and Jason did. Theatrical space is very important. It was traditional in ancient Athenian time for women to occupy inside space, however due to the physical arrangement of the theatre; this would have meant that Medea preformed the whole play from behind the Skene. Bringing Medea outside made for better viewing and meant that she was able to ‘compete(s) on equal terms with her male opponents’(4) . Both Eliza and Medea display a number of what would be considered masculine traits. Right from the beginning we learn that Medea has a very forceful personality and is a very strong character. She points out to Jason that she ‘saved his life’ (5)(line 475) and helped him get where he is by making sacrifices herself. Although Jason disagrees with her he doesn’t take the credit himself, instead he credits the Gods. We can also look at Eliza in the same way. Although she is lower class she also comes across as strong and wilful and capable of looking after and supporting herself rather than needing a man to do it. Eliza shows her stereotypically female side because she is fairly emotional and prone to outbreaks of crying. Medea uses her femininity to her advantage. She is very strong and forceful when dealing with Jason; however she assumes the submissive position of kneeling down when talking to Creon and cries to appeal to his sensitive side. She also turns on the charm with Aegeus and portrays herself as the suffering victim to ensure his help once she has had her revenge. Both Eliza and Medea are treated as property by the dominant men in their lives. Eliza’s father is happy to sell her to Higgins just to get her off his hands and Jason is quite happy to cast Medea aside when he finds a new wife. Both men however believe they are acting in the women’s best interest. Jason because he believes it will secure his family’s future and Mr Doolittle because he can’t afford to look after his daughter and thinks she will be better of with Higgins. Medea and Eliza are both put in vulnerable positions, Medea because if Jason leaves her she will be an outsider and neither her nor her sons will have any rights. Eliza is left in a difficult position because before Higgins decided to turn her in to a lady she had a job and could support herself, now however she is unable to get a job and needs to rely on someone else to look after her. This concern is reflected throughout the play by various characters and even by Eliza herself when she asks ‘why did you take my independence from me? ’(6) (Act 5, pg 101) Higgins comes across as bossy and a bully. He is extremely good at his job and believes that affords him the right to treat people as badly as he does. He almost doesn’t see Eliza as a woman but rather as a project so he isn’t worried about treating her ‘like a lady’ as long as she can behave like one when necessary. He doesn’t have any pre-conceptions on how women should be and is almost dismissive of those that marry just to be looked after. He even goes as far as saying that he thinks ‘a woman fetching a man’s slippers is a disgusting sight’ (Act 5, pg 100) (7). This re-emphasises Shaw’s belief and support of the women’s movement of the time. Shaw is eager to show that femininity isn’t necessarily a subservient thing. All of the main male characters in both plays display in part feminine characteristics, which both Medea and Eliza use to their advantage. When speaking to Creon Medea acts submissively by kneeling when speaking to him and appealing to his emotional side. Creon himself even admits that his ‘soft heart has often betrayed [him] (line 348-9)(8) , something which would be seen as a very feminine trait and definitely not something a King should admit to, as he should be all powerful and domineering. Compared to other women in the play Medea is by far the strongest. Although the Nurse also uses outdoor space she is scared of Medea and what she is capable of. The Chorus, which is made up of Corinthian women, plays a very prominent, important part in the play; however they are not strong enough to challenge Medea directly. They are in agreement that Jason’s behaviour is wrong but they don’t agree with the way Medea is going about seeking revenge. In Pygmalion Shaw uses Mrs Higgins to reinforce the theme of strong independent women. Mrs Higgins is clearly a woman of means and under no illusions about her son and his shortfalls. She is definitely the more dominant of the two characters and is more than happy to put Higgins in his place. She refers to him as a ‘silly boy’ which immediately shatters the illusion of him being masculine and dominant. Mrs Pearce, although of a different social class is also a fairly strong character and more than a match for Higgins. We see this in the way that she confronts him over his treatment of Eliza telling him that he ‘must be reasonable’ and he ‘cant walk over everybody’ (Act 2, pg 30) (9) Both plays end with the women leaving the men in their lives, enforcing the message that the females are the dominant characters. Shaw was a ‘self-proclaimed feminist’ and keen to portray Eliza as independent, hence the reason his play doesn’t end with Eliza conforming to type by marrying Higgins. The authors also use language as a way of differentiating between men and women. While Medea is in the private space her language is very emotive, full of anger and she can be heard ‘sobbing and wailing’ (line 202)(10) but as soon as she comes outside into the male domain her language automatically becomes more controlled and calm. Shaw also uses language to show a rougher more masculine side to Eliza when she says she wants to ‘smash’ Higgins face (Act 4, pg 76) (11). Medea uses very masculine language especially when talking about destroying her enemies. As Margaret Williamson(12) points out it gives Medea a ‘heroic dignity’ and further heightens the difference between her public and private voice. Eliza gets her own back on Higgins by denouncing his work in turning her into a lady. She credits Pickering for this knowing that it would get to Higgins. In contrast Medea uses Jason’s children to hurt him, which is much more drastic and spiteful. To sum up there are a number of ways that the authors of these plays portray femininity, such as the use of distinct language and submissive gestures. Both of the plays are centred around extremely competent women which shows how femininity can definitely be used to an advantage. The fact that the men in each of the plays also display feminine traits also shows that femininity itself is not strictly about women.